Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now

ow can public diplomacy address a state’s credibility deficit? Compare and contrast the practices of at least two countries with different political systems

Public diplomacy
Introduction
Democrats are members of the Democratic Party in America. They believe in the voices of the people. The members prefer the members of the public to vote for the person they feel deserves to be in whatever position of the public office for instance the Governors position (Paul 2011).
Comparison between U.S and Iraq
Both are diplomatic countries. In order to address the States credibility deficit, it will have to show it first with his people. U.S is known for the peace-making efforts in many countries. It also believes in diplomacy; the voice of the people (Paul 2011). Even though Iraq has been involved with violence;within the country and with other countries it respects its people and it believes in diplomacy; the voice of the people of Iraq.
Contrast between U.S and Iraq
A more peaceful country has a good credibility than a country that has been associated with war before. There are greater chances that U.S will be granted external means by either World Bank or International Monetary Fund in order to cater for their deficit unlike Iraq (Paul 2011). It is always the best alternative to use external means in order to cater for the country’s deficit instead of straining the country’s economy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, every country has its own way of addressing the state’s issues. It is therefore very important for the country to check on the impact of the country’s states affairs before making any major decisions. For instance, going to war; this will affect the credibility of the country majorly. The country should think about the welfare of the country as well as the welfare of its people.

Interested in a PLAGIARISM-FREE paper based on these particular instructions?...with 100% confidentiality?

Order Now