Two organizations exist in a community. Organization A’s policies reflect its beliefs that the organization’s taxes and employment of residents are sufficient contribution as a social effort. Organization B pursues multiple socially responsible efforts, including financial efforts, changes to be a more “green” organization, and donations of time for employees to contribute to the community. Why might these two organizations differ in their approaches? Do either have any obligation to the community? Why or why not? (Refer to the Milton Friedman Article posted in the main forum, for a reference point.) What are the advantages of the second organization’s approach? What about the first organization’s advantages?